Вилд Талкс
#wildtalks Веће грађана о Зеленој транзицији
Храна и пољопривреда
Last comment by
Participants
3
Groups
0
Reference: rdeu-DEBA-2024-05-45
Version number 2 (of 2) see other versions
Храна је кључна за живот, здравље и раст, али начин на који производимо храну глобално, са великим индустријама, изазива проблеме. То чини људе болеснима, доводи до крчења шума, штети биодиверзитету, доприноси климатским променама и често експлоатише раднике у прехрамбеном сектору. Како можемо да пређемо на одрживије системе исхране који нас одржавају здравим, штите природу и праведно третирају раднике? Може ли Европска унија (ЕУ) преузети водство у остваривању ове промјене?
#realdeal
List of Endorsements
Report inappropriate content
Is this content inappropriate?
Close debate
What is the summary or conclusion of this debate?
Detalji o komentaru
Vidite samo jedan komentar
View all comments
-Landsparing (for diversity protection) is possible also via agroforestry, but also if more gree (from micro to macro) is left in other areas: streets, the whole comple and surfaces of urban landscapes and peripheries, facades. Although urban agriculture will not solve the problem, it is quite important, because it "communicates" literacies and nurture our social tissue (ediblecitiesnetwork
-Regarding the interlink between agriculture and economy: agriculture is basis for the production of healthy nutrition. Thus an agriculture taht it is not environmental friendly is detrimental for EU citizens (and planet) health, i.e. thinking economically: it also causes diseases from overweight to respiratory and hormonal diseases.
In this sense ecological friendly practices and products must have lower taxes or be free of them, since on the long term, they contribute to healthy societies. Just think about of the millions of euros invested by EU to reasearch diabetes of children and young people.
Loading comments ...